full-disclosure - Re: Linux - Indicators of compromise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJVRA1S5mz1Hcg-6DSaC8TFc=Cj6=1VrzaCtpqTnNRd1uno-0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:42:18 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: Ali Varshovi <ali.varshovi@...mail.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux - Indicators of compromise

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Ali Varshovi <ali.varshovi@...mail.com> wrote:
> ....
> I'm thinking that we need a comparison base or normal behavior profile to be able to detect any deviations or abnormal/suspicious activity. While some known patterns of behaviors are useful to detect malware or backdoors we still need that normal profile to detect 0-day or APT style intrusions. Isn't that the same idea from early days of intrusion detection research (anomaly detection approach)?

yes, also called:

Anomaly Detection
Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection System
Outlier Detection
Behavior Analysis

and other things i've forgotten...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/