[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50350943.4000906@netvipe.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:30:59 +0200
From: kkhagel@...vipe.com
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: ZDI-12-149 : Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client
Verification Bypass Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
On 22.08.2012 18:18, Benji wrote:
> " User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that
> the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file."
>
> sorry, what?
Why not?! Cisco is using a System Service for upgrading parts of the VPN
client. The client simply performs an update check against the currently
configured VPN site, and updates if a newer version is available and the
site policy demands it.
So one could simply replace the previously patched vpndownloader.exe
with the vulnerable version and...
But I also don't understand why "User interaction is required to exploit
this vulnerability". I'm pretty sure it's also working without.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists