full-disclosure - Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 91, Issue 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFDEA79C12.43A72F66-ON85257A71.00605C95-85257A71.006492F1@UNIMIN.COM>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:16:00 -0400
From: SMiller@...min.com
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 91, Issue 9

Over the years I've done dozens (at least) of Adobe Flash updates on 
behalf of my employer. I'm not currently in a position to verify by 
experimentation, but my experience has been that under some (relatively 
infrequent) circumstances that check box is suppressed, or nonexistent. In 
those cases, the browser tool-bar (along with any other crapware that 
Adobe has solicited bribes to distribute) is installed without explicit 
opt-in. 

S. Miller

> Subject: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 91, Issue 9
....
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:26:54 -0600
> From: James Lay <jlay@...ve-tothe-box.net>
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Adobe Flash UpdateInstalls Other Warez
>    without Consent
> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
> Message-ID: <0e839c3f7588f803ead063cadad95e47@...alhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
...
> Perhaps someone didn't uncheck the checkbox on download....
...
> End of Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 91, Issue 9
> **********************************************

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/