full-disclosure - Re: Google's robots.txt handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50C647BF.4070209@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:36:15 +0000
From: Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Google's robots.txt handling

On 10/12/12 19:25, Hurgel Bumpf wrote:

> I tried to contact google, but as they didn't answer my email, I do forward this to FD.

> This shouldn't be a discussion about bad practice but the google feature itself. 

I seem to recall that the robots.txt exclusion standard was fairly
common before I ever heard of google, I'm thinking of the mid to late
1990s when alta vista (which at the time was I think a technology
demonstrator for VAX Alpha RISC hardware?) was the goto of search engines.

Rgds

Denis McMahon

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/