lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:37:52 -0500 From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> To: Philip Whitehouse <philip@...uk.com> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Google's robots.txt handling On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Philip Whitehouse <philip@...uk.com> wrote: > I restate my email's second point. > > Google is indexing robots.txt because (from all the examples I can see) > robots.txt doesn't contain a line to disallow indexing of robots.txt > > It is possible that some web sites provide actual content in a file that > happens to be called robots.txt (e.g a website concerned with AI > development). > > Could Google do better by removing the file? Sure. But as webmasters haven't > told them not to, even though they have provided other files not to index, > Google is doing exactly what they were asked. > Webmasters don't have to in the US - the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) means Google (et al) must operate within the authority granted by the webmasters. If that means the webmasters decide they don't want their site crawled, then Google (et al) has exceeded its authority and broken US Federal law. Just ask Weev. This system needs a submission based whitelist. Jeff _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists