[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD6s_XtjXtK+oM8VO-xUiAPhxZrGUnRr28LXm=dwSrUbtgKgRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:17:12 +0100
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Cc: "Mikhail A. Utin" <mutin@...monwealthcare.org>,
"full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: how to sell and get a fair price
Valdis, we've had spam companies suing blacklist/antispam companies
before...
Surely an anonymous person legitimately and legally enforcing copyright
can't be harder?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:03:03 -0500, "Mikhail A. Utin" said:
>
> > After all,a vulnerability and an exploit are intellectual products. Not
> > sure copyright could be claimed, but why not?
>
> Actually, claimed or not, if the exploit was coded in a Berne signatory
> country, it's almost always automatically copyrighted at creation (most
> likely
> to the coder, or to their employer if it was a work-for-hire). In the US,
> there's a exemption for work product of federal employees - that's one of
> the few ways for US-produced material to become public domain (expiration
> of
> term is the other one, but with ever-increasing copyright terms, it's
> unclear
> that anything will ever actually expire in the US).
>
> More interesting is the question of how to enforce a copyright claim
> while remaining anonymous...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists