lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nTLmpb-vbYxGMBwvYTnEKh17KzxCvcRTZ3WrNJa4+tXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:58 -0500
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: "Mikhail A. Utin" <mutin@...monwealthcare.org>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Subject: Re: how to sell and get a fair price

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Mikhail A. Utin
<mutin@...monwealthcare.org> wrote:
> In general practice, where ever you would like to publish, the publisher
> will ask for copyright rights. Thus, a site publishing exploits can do the
> same and thus may protect rights of the author, well, together with its
> ones.
>
> After all, my idea was about fare sale, and that could require release of
> rights to the mediator/auctioneer.
>
> Somebody I would bet is having a fair thought “buddy, would you do your
> idea?” I need to say frankly that I do not plan. I’m stretched by my current
> www.201cmr1700ma.com and its very likely extension. But feeling unfairness,
> will be glad to support and devout some time.
Sometimes the publisher cannot protect the identity of an anonymous
author. The real Rex Feral was dragged into court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hit_Man:_A_Technical_Manual_for_Independent_Contractors

Jeff

> From: Christian Sciberras [mailto:uuf6429@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: Valdis Kletnieks
> Cc: Mikhail A. Utin; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] how to sell and get a fair price
>
> Valdis, we've had spam companies suing blacklist/antispam companies
> before...
>
> Surely an anonymous person legitimately and legally enforcing copyright
> can't be harder?
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:03:03 -0500, "Mikhail A. Utin" said:
>
>>  After all,a  vulnerability and an exploit are intellectual products. Not
>> sure copyright could be claimed, but why not?
>
> Actually, claimed or not, if the exploit was coded in a Berne signatory
> country, it's almost always automatically copyrighted at creation (most
> likely
> to the coder, or to their employer if it was a work-for-hire).  In the US,
> there's a exemption for work product of federal employees - that's one of
> the few ways for US-produced material to become public domain (expiration of
> term is the other one, but with ever-increasing copyright terms, it's
> unclear
> that anything will ever actually expire in the US).
>
> More interesting is the question of how to enforce a copyright claim
> while remaining anonymous...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ