lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nTLmpb-vbYxGMBwvYTnEKh17KzxCvcRTZ3WrNJa4+tXA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:58 -0500 From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> To: "Mikhail A. Utin" <mutin@...monwealthcare.org> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> Subject: Re: how to sell and get a fair price On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Mikhail A. Utin <mutin@...monwealthcare.org> wrote: > In general practice, where ever you would like to publish, the publisher > will ask for copyright rights. Thus, a site publishing exploits can do the > same and thus may protect rights of the author, well, together with its > ones. > > After all, my idea was about fare sale, and that could require release of > rights to the mediator/auctioneer. > > Somebody I would bet is having a fair thought “buddy, would you do your > idea?” I need to say frankly that I do not plan. I’m stretched by my current > www.201cmr1700ma.com and its very likely extension. But feeling unfairness, > will be glad to support and devout some time. Sometimes the publisher cannot protect the identity of an anonymous author. The real Rex Feral was dragged into court. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hit_Man:_A_Technical_Manual_for_Independent_Contractors Jeff > From: Christian Sciberras [mailto:uuf6429@...il.com] > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 4:17 PM > To: Valdis Kletnieks > Cc: Mikhail A. Utin; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] how to sell and get a fair price > > Valdis, we've had spam companies suing blacklist/antispam companies > before... > > Surely an anonymous person legitimately and legally enforcing copyright > can't be harder? > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:03:03 -0500, "Mikhail A. Utin" said: > >> After all,a vulnerability and an exploit are intellectual products. Not >> sure copyright could be claimed, but why not? > > Actually, claimed or not, if the exploit was coded in a Berne signatory > country, it's almost always automatically copyrighted at creation (most > likely > to the coder, or to their employer if it was a work-for-hire). In the US, > there's a exemption for work product of federal employees - that's one of > the few ways for US-produced material to become public domain (expiration of > term is the other one, but with ever-increasing copyright terms, it's > unclear > that anything will ever actually expire in the US). > > More interesting is the question of how to enforce a copyright claim > while remaining anonymous... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists