full-disclosure - Re: Port scanning /0 using insecure embedded devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <16492.1363914507@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:08:27 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: noloader@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Port scanning /0 using insecure embedded
	devices

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:25:18 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:
> > Many of them are based on Linux and allow
> > login to standard BusyBox with empty or
> > default credentials.
> Forgive my ignorance, but what does the authentication problem (or
> lack thereof) have to do with linux/uclibc/busybox? It seems to be a
> manufacturer problem (for example, Actiontec) or an  integrator
> problem (such as Verizon or Comacast), unless I am missing something.

For the integrator, it's a warning flag: "53 companies have made this same
identical mistake, don't be the 54th".

For the black hats, it's low-hanging fruit.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/