full-disclosure - Re: [ MDVSA-2013:101 ] lynx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPMrQTSys=bOY07u1EwiD4aS20xvnFw2xMFsUDe_3wbLAnkHAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:22:33 +0300
From: Julius Kivimäki <julius.kivimaki@...il.com>
To: Peter W-S <peterwintrsmith@...il.com>, 
 "security@...driva.com" <security@...driva.com>, 
 "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [ MDVSA-2013:101 ] lynx

But sending 10 emails in a row is necessary?


2013/4/10 Erik Falor <ewfalor@...il.com>

> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Peter W-S wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to spam the list with a separate email for every
> issue you want to report? Perhaps one email a week with a link to the full
> report would suffice?
>
> It is necessary.
>
> Waiting a week for a batched email to find out my software has
> vulnerabilities is not acceptable just because some people insist on
> reading email on their telephone.
>
> --
> Erik Falor                                       http://unnovative.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/