lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:22:33 +0300
From: Julius Kivimäki <julius.kivimaki@...il.com>
To: Peter W-S <peterwintrsmith@...il.com>, 
 "security@...driva.com" <security@...driva.com>, 
 "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [ MDVSA-2013:101 ] lynx

But sending 10 emails in a row is necessary?


2013/4/10 Erik Falor <ewfalor@...il.com>

> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Peter W-S wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to spam the list with a separate email for every
> issue you want to report? Perhaps one email a week with a link to the full
> report would suffice?
>
> It is necessary.
>
> Waiting a week for a batched email to find out my software has
> vulnerabilities is not acceptable just because some people insist on
> reading email on their telephone.
>
> --
> Erik Falor                                       http://unnovative.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ