full-disclosure - Re: coderman's keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJVRA1QdMDQqs4=Z+OyFRzSEteCHh6D2R344T2BBqdr8=bsKbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:11:46 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: cpunks <cypherpunks@...nks.org>,
 Cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@...qaeda.net>, 
 Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, 
 Discussion of cryptography and related <cryptography@...dombit.net>
Subject: Re: coderman's keys

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
> my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.
>
> there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
> agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
> email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
> bug...  "you must be this high to ride..."

still no successful encrypted responses.  do i have to sweeten this pot?

let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
successfully encrypts a message to my key.

... ready, set, go!

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/