lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJVRA1QdMDQqs4=Z+OyFRzSEteCHh6D2R344T2BBqdr8=bsKbw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:11:46 -0700 From: coderman <coderman@...il.com> To: cpunks <cypherpunks@...nks.org>, Cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@...qaeda.net>, Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, Discussion of cryptography and related <cryptography@...dombit.net> Subject: Re: coderman's keys On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote: > my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider. > > there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i > agree fully. however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure > email. yes your default client will balk. this is a feature not a > bug... "you must be this high to ride..." still no successful encrypted responses. do i have to sweeten this pot? let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever successfully encrypts a message to my key. ... ready, set, go! _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists