lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=BO5_QLm8CciDou8=1Kzq14h4kcha7wwJ435UaDA84pA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:55:00 -0500 From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> To: Gary Baribault <gary@...ibault.net> Cc: Full Disclosure List <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full) disclosure On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Gary Baribault <gary@...ibault.net> wrote: > Rather harsh don't you think? I'm all for OSS but I have expenses and > need to make money. Yes M$ makes money, but I think their ethical just > as much as any other company .. is IBM ethical? Is HP ethical? Is Dell > (the company) ethical? They all are to some degree. Try Apple. They withhold security updates until the press release for their latest iOS version. See, for example, the hundred of fixes in https://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/Sep/msg00003.html. At least Microsoft patches on a regular basis. Jeff _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists