full-disclosure - Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full) disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:37:02 -0400
From: Pedro Luis Karrasquillo <peter_toyota@...mail.com>
To: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full)
 disclosure

Allright.
After I chatted with a MS rep (I posted the transcript of the short conversation elsewhere in the thread), I got a response in the list from secure()microsoft. I sent the details to secure()microsoft of the bug and the mitigation steps.

Again, I am glad to read the variety of opinions on this issue. Hopefully the bug will be confirmed/fixed in a reasonable time and I will share the details with you once I get MS's take on it.

> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:32:16 -0600
> From: envygeeks@...il.com
> To: gary@...ibault.net
> CC: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Where are you guys standing re: the (full)	disclosure
> 
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Gary Baribault <gary@...ibault.net> wrote:
> > Of course, all software companies would love for the disclosure to wait
> > for the fix to be released, and often, if the delay is considered
> > reasonable by the hacker in question who found the bug, then that's what
> > happens. I think it's only in the case where the company considers the
> > bug to be minor or non existent, and they are asking for a ridiculous
> > delay that many hackers will say, 'tough luck I'm disclosing on xx' and
> > he takes his chances that most of us agree with his decision. As Mikhail
> > said, if the hacker came across the bug without any illegal means then
> > he should be fine after the release (but IANAL).
> 
> To add, in cases where people do release security updates even if a
> fix is pending it's most of the time not to do with the time line and
> more to do with the fact that the entity with the problem are trying
> to silence the "hacker" to prevent embarrassment.  At least from what
> I've noticed and experienced.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
 		 	   		  
Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/