[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106180431.60e6f99f@anubis.defcon1>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:04:31 +0100
From: Bzzz <lazyvirus@....com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity
applications, Guardian
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:14:10 +0100
Anonymous <anonymous@...-polloi.org> wrote:
> Since the GSM f/w controls a radio, and thus the power, it may
> need a FCC certification. In which case you would need someone to
> finance the certification every time a new version of the Gnu
> firmware is released (FSF perhaps?).
No, in most countries this was taken in account and rejected
by the authorities because the certification is tied to the
electronics apparatus and not to the software/firmware that
drives it (with the frequency range exception in the mobile
domain, but this is already covered by other rules than
certification).
For once, authorities where quite wise (but don't take that for
granted in other domains;)
JY
--
If women were good, God would have one.
If they were trusted, Satan wouldn't have horns.
-- Coluche
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists