full-disclosure - Re: Chrome (and Safari) antiXSS filter bypass

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPS+U982M4=YETY58H6tZ93Jimin_sQVSL-_XCpkOCRNXzoSGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:52:44 +1300
From: Pedro Worcel <pedro@...cel.com>
To: "vulns@...aths.com" <vulns@...aths.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Chrome (and Safari) antiXSS filter bypass

Hey,

I got a 403 while attempting to visit the URL.

Error 403 demofaast.elevenpaths.com <http://demofaast.elevenpaths.com:9002/>
Apache/2.4.4 (Win32) OpenSSL/0.9.8y PHP/5.4.19

Thanks,
Pedro


2014/1/22 vulns@...aths.com <vulns@...aths.com>

>  Modern browsers usually have an antiXSS filter, that protects users from
> some of the consequences of this kind of attacks. Normally, they block
> cross site scripting execution, so the "injected" code (normally,
> JavaScript or HTML) is not executed inside victim's browser. Chrome calls
> this filter XSSAuditor.
>
>
> But if the victim visits a website with an XSS problem that an attacker is
> trying to take advantage of, it would not be fully protected. This  bug
> is  based  on  a  misuse  of  srcdoc  attribute  of  IFRAME tag,  included
> in  HTML5 definition.  To  perform an  XSS  attack  on Google  Chrome
> Browser or Safari  using this  bug,  the website must  include an IFRAME
> and must be able to read any attribute of this element from HTTP parameters
> (GET/POST) without applying any charset filter. Then, in the IFRAME
> parameter,  the  srcdoc  attribute  may be included with JavaScript
> code. The browser cannot filter it and will be executed.
>
>
> An HTML injection on src parameter would be:
>
>
> iframe src=""srcdoc="<script>alert('Bypass message')</script>"
>
>
> For a proof of concept, visit:
>
>
>
> http://demofaast.elevenpaths.com:9002/xssbypass/iframebypass.php?iframe=%22srcdoc=%22%3Cscript%3Ealert('Bypass%20message')%3C/script%3E
>
>
> The problem was reported in October, the 23rd. They fixed it two days
> later, making XSSAuditor catch reflected srcdoc properties even without an
> "IFRAME" tag injection. Chrome has just fixed it in recent 32.0.1700.76
> version.
>
>
> Safari for Mac and iPhone is vulnerable as well.
>
>
>
> This weakness has been discovered by Ioseba Palop from Eleven Paths (
> ioseba.palop@...aths.com). Full samples and detailed explanation here:
> http://blog.elevenpaths.com/2014/01/how-to-bypass-antixss-filter-in-chrome.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



-- 
GPG: http://is.gd/droope <http://is.gd/signature_>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/