full-disclosure - Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+CewVCtE3tMejcX+4AxdBmoZ_XU+tSFuhPp-FOw2YT_tX1XsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:30:51 +0000
From: "Nicholas Lemonias." <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>
To: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

I suggest you to read on Content Delivery Network Architectures .

 YouTube.com populates and distributes stored files to multiple servers
through a CDN (Content Delivery Architecture), where each video uses more
than one machine (hosted by a cluster). Less populated video files are
normally stored in various colocation sites. The YouTube architecture uses
databases for storing metadata information of all uploaded files.

https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Unrestricted_File_Upload


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Nicholas Lemonias. <
lem.nikolas@...glemail.com> wrote:

> *https://www.google.com/settings/takeout
> <https://www.google.com/settings/takeout> *
>
> *However the only problem would be to get past Content ID filtering. I
> suppose encrypting an uploaded file, and obfuscating file headers may get
> past YouTube's Content ID filtering. Youtube is not a File Transfer
> Protocol... It's there to serve media content. *
>
> <https://www.google.gr/#>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Keep in mind that YouTube allows files to be uploaded by definition. What
>> you have achieved is upload a file for an extension type that is not
>> allowed.
>> It is definitely a vulnerability but a low risk one since you haven't
>> demonstrated if it has any ill effects.
>>
>> Can you somehow find the URL to where the file was uploaded? I would
>> guess not, since a well designed service like YouTube should hide those
>> details and no leak them in any way. Maybe if you are able to find that you
>> can combine with this vulnerability and get them to open their wallet?
>>
>> Regards
>> Pedro
>> On 13 Mar 2014 11:50, "Nicholas Lemonias." <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Google vulnerabilities uncovered...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Expert-Finds-File-Upload-Vulnerability-in-YouTube-Google-Denies-It-s-a-Security-Issue-431489.shtml
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/