lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396957500.16523.79.camel@x200.mitev.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:45:00 +0100
From: Nik Mitev <nik@...ev.net>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160

Downgraded and tested again.
Testing Tor with ssltest.py shows successful SSL connection and no
response to the heartbeat request, reports not vulnerable.
Testing OpenVPN - TCP connection OK, SSL connection fails, server
reports MTU discrepancy. Complaining that a 277 byte frame does not have
a length between 0 and 1559 - possibly not vulnerable.
Apache, Postfix and Courier instances were all vulnerable.



-----Original Message-----
From: Nik Mitev <nik@...ev.net>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:31:46 +0100

I used the tool Kirils linked (http://possible.lv/tools/hb/) and my
unpatched servers running a Tor node or an Openvpn server returned
correct (old) version of openssl but not vulnerable.
Is it the bug or the tool that seems to be limited to https I wonder?

Patched now so can't test with this tool...

-----Original Message-----
From: Fraser Scott <fraser.scott@...il.com>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:24:02 +0100

This seems to be the best test so far:

http://s3.jspenguin.org/ssltest.py

Other tests false-positive on patched versions from what I can see.


On 8 April 2014 01:10, Kirils Solovjovs <kirils.solovjovs@...ils.com> wrote:

> We are doomed.
>
> Description: http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
> Article dedicated to the bug: http://heartbleed.com/
> Tool to check if TLS heartbeat extension is supported:
> http://possible.lv/tools/hb/
>
> A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension
> can be used to reveal up to 64kB of memory to a connected client or server.
>
> 1.0.1[ abcdef] affected.
>
>
> P.S. Happy Monday!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
>

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)


_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ