full-disclosure - Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CADgS1nmAW1AUFOBYDCVsOR97jCNyc0HqkqEWiT3-ts8PLz0eLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:52:52 -0700
From: Jeremy Voorhis <jvoorhis@...il.com>
To: Kirils Solovjovs <kirils.solovjovs@...ils.com>
Cc: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160

I just read an article titled "Why heartbleed doesn't leak the private key"
and the claim seems irresponsible and overly broad. Can anyone comment on
his analysis?

http://blog.erratasec.com/2014/04/why-heartbleed-doesnt-leak-private-key.html#.U0WjNK1dWBg

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kirils Solovjovs <
kirils.solovjovs@...ils.com> wrote:

> We are doomed.
>
> Description: http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
> Article dedicated to the bug: http://heartbleed.com/
> Tool to check if TLS heartbeat extension is supported:
> http://possible.lv/tools/hb/
>
> A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension
> can be used to reveal up to 64kB of memory to a connected client or server.
>
> 1.0.1[ abcdef] affected.
>
>
> P.S. Happy Monday!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
>

-- 
Jeremy Voorhis

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives