[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140409213349.GB27691@unser.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 23:33:49 +0200
From: Juergen Christoffel <jc@...er.net>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:24:25PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>iptables logging needs to be rate-limit always because how it works
>otherwise you have a problem the first time it really happens seriously
Using limits is sensible, yes. But
> -m limit --limit 1/m
this might be a bit too restrictive to gather data on attempts at
heartbleeding. And --hashlimit might be more appropriate too as it keeps a
counter per IP address.
--jc
--
A great many of today's security technologies are "secure" only because
no-one has ever bothered attacking them. -- Peter Gutmann
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists