full-disclosure - Re: [FD] Legitimacy of new Heartbleed exploit?

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:00:17 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] Legitimacy of new Heartbleed exploit?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:18:04AM -1000, Dillon Korman wrote:
> Saw a link to this:
> http://pastebin.com/qPxR9BRv
> 
> Do you think there really is a working exploit on new versions of OpenSSL? 

It's bullshit. They say: 'A missing bounds check in the handling of the
variable "DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS"'. That's not a variable, the "D" is
not actually part of the name, and it's a compile-time macro that
configures whether heartbeats will be compiled in or not. And because
it's a compile-time thing, it's nothing that an attacker could ever
influence.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives