lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:00:17 +0200
From: Jann Horn <>
Subject: Re: [FD] Legitimacy of new Heartbleed exploit?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:18:04AM -1000, Dillon Korman wrote:
> Saw a link to this:
> Do you think there really is a working exploit on new versions of OpenSSL? 

It's bullshit. They say: 'A missing bounds check in the handling of the
variable "DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS"'. That's not a variable, the "D" is
not actually part of the name, and it's a compile-time macro that
configures whether heartbeats will be compiled in or not. And because
it's a compile-time thing, it's nothing that an attacker could ever

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
Web Archives & RSS:

Powered by blists - more mailing lists