[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx_OUCJ=U5VnMNQqxEBi=bZ63JWvD2bxysrDcAs8HDQfY+COA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:55:42 -0700
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
To: defensecode <defensecode@...ensecode.com>
Cc: "fulldisclosure@...lists.org" <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>
Subject: Re: [FD] Back To The Future: Unix Wildcards Gone Wild
> We wanted to inform all major *nix distributions via our responsible
> disclosure policy about this problem before posting it
I'm not sure how to put it mildly, but I think you might have been
scooped on this some 1-2 decades ago...
Off the top of my head, there's a rant about this behavior in "The
Unix-Haters Handbook", and there are several highly detailed articles
by David Wheeler published over the years (e.g.,
http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/filenames-in-shell.html).
Yup, it's a counterintuitive behavior that leads to security problems.
The odds of changing the semantics at this point are very slim. Other
operating systems have their own idiosyncrasies in this area - for
example, Windows it not a lot better with parameter splitting and
special filenames.
/mz
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists