full-disclosure

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:37:39 -0400
From: Bryan Bickford <bryan@...wildhats.com>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: [FD] Public WiFi Pcaps

Greetings,

I am starting some wifi research and had questions about the legality of
listening to unencrypted, public wifi data and publishing subsequent
research.

>From what I understand, the wiretap act prohibits listening to
communications that were not configured to be readily accessible to the
general public. Specifically:

...permits "any person" to intercept an electronic communication made
through a system "that is configured so that . . . [the] communication is
readily accessible to the general public."

I have seen debates about whether an unencrypted access point (e.g.
starbucks) qualifies under this exception. Is there any concrete legal
precedent that defines this either way?

The only one I can think of is the google street view case, and they lost.
http://epic.org/privacy/streetview/

>From a technical viewpoint, you are just reading unencrypted radio waves. I
see no technical reason that it's any different than listening to an FM
radio station.

Anyone else have more insight/experience?

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives