lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54105978.3060504@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:00:24 +0100
From: Mark Thomas <markt@...che.org>
To: Tomcat Users List <users@...cat.apache.org>
Cc: Tomcat Developers List <dev@...cat.apache.org>, fulldisclosure@...lists.org,
	announce@...cat.apache.org, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, announce@...che.org
Subject: [FD] [SECURITY] CVE-2013-4444 Remote Code Execution in Apache Tomcat

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CVE-2013-4444 Remote Code Execution

Severity: Important

Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

Versions Affected:
- - Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.39

Description:
In very limited circumstances, it was possible for an attacker to upload
a malicious JSP to a Tomcat server and then trigger the execution of
that JSP. While Remote Code Execution would normally be viewed as a
critical vulnerability, the circumstances under which this is possible
are, in the view of the Tomcat security team, sufficiently limited that
this vulnerability is viewed as important.
For this attack to succeed all of the following requirements must be met:
a) Using Oracle Java 1.7.0 update 25 or earlier (or any other Java
   implementation where java.io.File is vulnerable to null byte
   injection).
b) A web application must be deployed to a vulnerable version of Tomcat
   (see previous section).
c) The web application must use the Servlet 3.0 File Upload feature.
d) A file location within a deployed web application must be writeable
   by the user the Tomcat process is running as. The Tomcat security
   documentation recommends against this.
e) A custom listener for JMX connections (e.g. the JmxRemoteListener
   that is not enabled by default) must be configured and be able to
   load classes from Tomcat's common class loader (i.e. the custom JMX
   listener must be placed in Tomcat's lib directory)
f) The custom JMX listener must be bound to an address other than
   localhost for a remote attack (it is bound to localhost by default).
   If the custom JMX listener is bound to localhost, a local attack
   will still be possible.

Note that requirements b) and c) may be replaced with the following
requirement:
g) A web application is deployed that uses Apache Commons File Upload
   1.2.1 or earlier.
In this case a similar vulnerability may exist on any Servlet container,
not just Apache Tomcat.

Mitigation:
This vulnerability may be mitigated by using any one of the following
mitigations:
- - Upgrade to Oracle Java 1.7.0 update 40 or later (or any other Java
  implementation where java.io.File is not vulnerable to null byte
  injection).
- - Use OS file permissions to prevent the process Tomcat is running as
  from writing to any location within a deployed application.
- - Disable any custom JMX listeners
- - Upgrade to Apache Tomcat 7.0.40 or later

Credit:
This issue was identified by Pierre Ernst of the VMware Security
Engineering, Communications & Response group (vSECR)  and reported to
the Tomcat security team via the Pivotal security team.

References:
[1] http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=98BB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ