lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGuiMHgiK9C=S9=c0VJAqTT0X3PYkA1dys_q6WbH5e54EaasBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 03:48:52 -0400
From: Michael Bazzinotti <mbazzinotti@...il.com>
To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org
Subject: Re: [FD] the other bash RCEs (CVE-2014-6277 and CVE-2014-6278)

In reference to Michal Zalewski's detailed post:
>Perhaps notably, the ability to specify attacker-controlled addresses
>hinges on the state of --enable-bash-malloc and --enable-mem-scramble

The correct ./configure argument for bash-malloc is --with-bash-malloc.
Just wanted to note that out. I learned this from going to compile bash
myself with these flags just now. :)

>compile-time flags; if both are enabled, the memory returned by
>xmalloc() will be initialized to 0xdf, making the prospect of
>exploitation more speculative (essentially depending on whether the
>stack or any other memory region can be grown to overlap with
>0xdfdfdfdf)

Cheers,
-- 
*****************************
Michael Bazzinotti
University of Massachusetts Boston
bazz@...umb.edu
http://www.bazz1.com

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ