[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJB2JzuT73pYyZXS8tZQgV5FjDBsqWk3_ZjqawvRDPD+Jcd+EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:40:05 +0200
From: Mario Vilas <mvilas@...il.com>
To: Grond <grond66@...il.com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
fulldisclosure <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>,
Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [FD] [oss-security] CVE request: remote code execution in
Android CTS
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Grond <grond66@...il.com> wrote:
> Is this kind of file ever *intended* to be used as an executable script?
> If the answer is "no"; then you should apply fixes.
>
Seems to me like it was. Also, wouldn't a user who can edit those files
also be able to, for example, patch the executable files as well? I haven't
actually checked the file permissions but it seems like a reasonable
assumption.
--
“There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights the enemy
of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military
becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists