lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:29:25 -0400 From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> To: Fyodor <fyodor@...p.org> Cc: Full Disclosure Mailing List <fulldisclosure@...lists.org> Subject: Re: [FD] Security contact @ Gigabyte > Yeah, the general FD list policy is to reject requests for vendor contacts > unless they also include full disclosure of the bug details: > > https://secwiki.org/w/FD_Moderation#Requests_for_vendor_security_contacts > > It's not that there is anything wrong with the more limited disclosure and > vendor pre-disclosure approaches, but those aren't full disclosure and so > probably belong on a different list. Maybe FunSec (http://lists.linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec) would be a better place to ask for hep finding the contact: Funsec -- Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. Jeff _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists