full-disclosure

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAH8yC8mYR=CEn8=+58xp44W7ZQu9TJj0v-ActOZGxXP9FAd2ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:29:25 -0400
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: Fyodor <fyodor@...p.org>
Cc: Full Disclosure Mailing List <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>
Subject: Re: [FD] Security contact @ Gigabyte

> Yeah, the general FD list policy is to reject requests for vendor contacts
> unless they also include full disclosure of the bug details:
>
> https://secwiki.org/w/FD_Moderation#Requests_for_vendor_security_contacts
>
> It's not that there is anything wrong with the more limited disclosure and
> vendor pre-disclosure approaches, but those aren't full disclosure and so
> probably belong on a different list.

Maybe FunSec (http://lists.linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec)
would be a better place to ask for hep finding the contact:

    Funsec -- Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.

Jeff

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives