[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HE1PR03MB3129CAA5B6E6F36B109DC15CA62B0@HE1PR03MB3129.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:36:39 +0000
From: Victor Angelier CCX <vangelier@...mail.com>
To: "fulldisclosure@...lists.org" <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>
Subject: [FD] Redhat/CentOS root through network-scripts
Hi there,
Just found an issue in Redhat/CentOS which according to RedHat security team is not an issue. I don't know, sounds weird to me.
If, for whatever reason, a user is able to write an ifcf-<whatever> script to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts or it can adjust an existing one, then your system in pwned.
Network scripts, ifcg-eth0 for example are used for network connections. The look exactly like .INI files. However, they are ~sourced~ on Linux by Network Manager (dispatcher.d).
In my case, the NAME= attributed in these network scripts is not handled correctly. If you have white/blank space in the name the system tries to execute the part after the white/blank space. Which means; everything after the first blank space is executed as root.
For example:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-1337
NAME=Network /bin/id <= Note the blank space
ONBOOT=yes
DEVICE=eth0
Yes, any script in that folder is executed by root because of the sourcing technique. Ex: . /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-1337
Me as a developer, I don't really get why you want to do it like this. Its just <~>
So, if a use manage to get his hands on any of these files your box is gone. Protect them with your life.
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists