| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f01399f5-3639-4ded-a199-3018656bc835@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:08:51 -0600 From: Mark Esler <mark.esler@...onical.com> To: fulldisclosure@...lists.org Subject: Re: [FD] null pointer deference in nano via read_the_list() Hi Meng, In your recent mass posts to FD, are you reporting vulnerabilities or bug reports which have words like "segfault" in the title? What benefit do you see this having? Have you spoken to each upstream project before requesting a CVE be assigned? Thank you, Mark Esler On 1/19/24 22:05, Meng Ruijie wrote: > [Vulnerability description] > Nano v6.2 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function read_the_list(). > > [VulnerabilityType Other] > null pointer deference > > [Vendor of Product] > nano > > [Affected Product Code Base] > nano - 6.2 > > [Reference] > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?64465 > > [CVE Reference] > The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2023-45932 to this vulnerability. > _______________________________________________ > Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list > https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure > Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/ _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists