lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:05:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-cve-announce@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: CVE-2022-48664: btrfs: fix hang during unmount when stopping a space reclaim worker

Description
===========

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix hang during unmount when stopping a space reclaim worker

Often when running generic/562 from fstests we can hang during unmount,
resulting in a trace like this:

  Sep 07 11:52:00 debian9 unknown: run fstests generic/562 at 2022-09-07 11:52:00
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: INFO: task umount:49438 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:       Not tainted 6.0.0-rc2-btrfs-next-122 #1
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: task:umount          state:D stack:    0 pid:49438 ppid: 25683 flags:0x00004000
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: Call Trace:
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  <TASK>
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  __schedule+0x3c8/0xec0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  schedule+0x5d/0xf0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  schedule_timeout+0xf1/0x130
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? lock_acquired+0x1a0/0x420
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2c/0xd0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  __wait_for_common+0xac/0x200
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? usleep_range_state+0xb0/0xb0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  __flush_work+0x26d/0x530
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x140/0x140
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? trace_clock_local+0xc/0x30
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  __cancel_work_timer+0x11f/0x1b0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? close_ctree+0x12b/0x5b3 [btrfs]
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? __trace_bputs+0x10b/0x170
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  close_ctree+0x152/0x5b3 [btrfs]
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  ? evict_inodes+0x166/0x1c0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  generic_shutdown_super+0x71/0x120
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0xa0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  task_work_run+0x59/0xa0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1a6/0x1b0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fcde59a57a7
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe914217c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fcde5ae8264 RCX: 00007fcde59a57a7
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055b57556cdd0
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RBP: 000055b57556cba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe91420570
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: R13: 000055b57556cdd0 R14: 000055b57556ccb8 R15: 0000000000000000
  Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel:  </TASK>

What happens is the following:

1) The cleaner kthread tries to start a transaction to delete an unused
   block group, but the metadata reservation can not be satisfied right
   away, so a reservation ticket is created and it starts the async
   metadata reclaim task (fs_info->async_reclaim_work);

2) Writeback for all the filler inodes with an i_size of 2K starts
   (generic/562 creates a lot of 2K files with the goal of filling
   metadata space). We try to create an inline extent for them, but we
   fail when trying to insert the inline extent with -ENOSPC (at
   cow_file_range_inline()) - since this is not critical, we fallback
   to non-inline mode (back to cow_file_range()), reserve extents, create
   extent maps and create the ordered extents;

3) An unmount starts, enters close_ctree();

4) The async reclaim task is flushing stuff, entering the flush states one
   by one, until it reaches RUN_DELAYED_IPUTS. There it runs all current
   delayed iputs.

   After running the delayed iputs and before calling
   btrfs_wait_on_delayed_iputs(), one or more ordered extents complete,
   and btrfs_add_delayed_iput() is called for each one through
   btrfs_finish_ordered_io() -> btrfs_put_ordered_extent(). This results
   in bumping fs_info->nr_delayed_iputs from 0 to some positive value.

   So the async reclaim task blocks at btrfs_wait_on_delayed_iputs() waiting
   for fs_info->nr_delayed_iputs to become 0;

5) The current transaction is committed by the transaction kthread, we then
   start unpinning extents and end up calling btrfs_try_granting_tickets()
   through unpin_extent_range(), since we released some space.
   This results in satisfying the ticket created by the cleaner kthread at
   step 1, waking up the cleaner kthread;

6) At close_ctree() we ask the cleaner kthread to park;

7) The cleaner kthread starts the transaction, deletes the unused block
   group, and then calls kthread_should_park(), which returns true, so it
   parks. And at this point we have the delayed iputs added by the
   completion of the ordered extents still pending;

8) Then later at close_ctree(), when we call:

       cancel_work_sync(&fs_info->async_reclaim_work);

   We hang forever, since the cleaner was parked and no one else can run
   delayed iputs after that, while the reclaim task is waiting for the
   remaining delayed iputs to be completed.

Fix this by waiting for all ordered extents to complete and running the
delayed iputs before attempting to stop the async reclaim tasks. Note that
we can not wait for ordered extents with btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() (or
other similar functions) because that waits for the BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE
flag to be set on an ordered extent, but the delayed iput is added after
that, when doing the final btrfs_put_ordered_extent(). So instead wait for
the work queues used for executing ordered extent completion to be empty,
which works because we do the final put on an ordered extent at
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() (while we are in the unmount context).

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48664 to this issue.


Affected and fixed versions
===========================

	Issue introduced in 4.20 with commit d6fd0ae25c64 and fixed in 5.10.147 with commit 6ac5b52e3f35
	Issue introduced in 4.20 with commit d6fd0ae25c64 and fixed in 5.15.71 with commit d8a76a2e514f
	Issue introduced in 4.20 with commit d6fd0ae25c64 and fixed in 5.19.12 with commit c338bea1fec5
	Issue introduced in 4.20 with commit d6fd0ae25c64 and fixed in 6.0 with commit a362bb864b8d
	Issue introduced in 4.14.120 with commit 1ec2bf44c377
	Issue introduced in 4.19.12 with commit b4c7c826709b

Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
kernel versions by the kernel community.

Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
older supported kernel versions.  The official CVE entry at
	https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2022-48664
will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
up to date information about this issue.


Affected files
==============

The file(s) affected by this issue are:
	fs/btrfs/disk-io.c


Mitigation
==========

The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes.  Individual
changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
release.  Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
supported by the Linux kernel community at all.  If however, updating to
the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
issue can be found at these commits:
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac5b52e3f352f9cb270c89e6e1d4dadb564ddb8
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8a76a2e514fbbb315a6dfff2d342de2de833994
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c338bea1fec5504290dc0acf026c9e7dba25004b
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a362bb864b8db4861977d00bd2c3222503ccc34b

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ