[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022624-CVE-2022-49236-e3f7@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 02:57:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-cve-announce@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: CVE-2022-49236: bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module
Description
===========
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module
While working on code to populate kfunc BTF ID sets for module BTF from
its initcall, I noticed that by the time the initcall is invoked, the
module BTF can already be seen by userspace (and the BPF verifier). The
existing btf_try_get_module calls try_module_get which only fails if
mod->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING, i.e. it can increment module reference
when module initcall is happening in parallel.
Currently, BTF parsing happens from MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier
callback. At this point, the module initcalls have not been invoked.
The notifier callback parses and prepares the module BTF, allocates an
ID, which publishes it to userspace, and then adds it to the btf_modules
list allowing the kernel to invoke btf_try_get_module for the BTF.
However, at this point, the module has not been fully initialized (i.e.
its initcalls have not finished). The code in module.c can still fail
and free the module, without caring for other users. However, nothing
stops btf_try_get_module from succeeding between the state transition
from MODULE_STATE_COMING to MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
This leads to a use-after-free issue when BPF program loads
successfully in the state transition, load_module's do_init_module call
fails and frees the module, and BPF program fd on close calls module_put
for the freed module. Future patch has test case to verify we don't
regress in this area in future.
There are multiple points after prepare_coming_module (in load_module)
where failure can occur and module loading can return error. We
illustrate and test for the race using the last point where it can
practically occur (in module __init function).
An illustration of the race:
CPU 0 CPU 1
load_module
notifier_call(MODULE_STATE_COMING)
btf_parse_module
btf_alloc_id // Published to userspace
list_add(&btf_mod->list, btf_modules)
mod->init(...)
... ^
bpf_check |
check_pseudo_btf_id |
btf_try_get_module |
returns true | ...
... | module __init in progress
return prog_fd | ...
... V
if (ret < 0)
free_module(mod)
...
close(prog_fd)
...
bpf_prog_free_deferred
module_put(used_btf.mod) // use-after-free
We fix this issue by setting a flag BTF_MODULE_F_LIVE, from the notifier
callback when MODULE_STATE_LIVE state is reached for the module, so that
we return NULL from btf_try_get_module for modules that are not fully
formed. Since try_module_get already checks that module is not in
MODULE_STATE_GOING state, and that is the only transition a live module
can make before being removed from btf_modules list, this is enough to
close the race and prevent the bug.
A later selftest patch crafts the race condition artifically to verify
that it has been fixed, and that verifier fails to load program (with
ENXIO).
Lastly, a couple of comments:
1. Even if this race didn't exist, it seems more appropriate to only
access resources (ksyms and kfuncs) of a fully formed module which
has been initialized completely.
2. This patch was born out of need for synchronization against module
initcall for the next patch, so it is needed for correctness even
without the aforementioned race condition. The BTF resources
initialized by module initcall are set up once and then only looked
up, so just waiting until the initcall has finished ensures correct
behavior.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-49236 to this issue.
Affected and fixed versions
===========================
Issue introduced in 5.12 with commit 541c3bad8dc51b253ba8686d0cd7628e6b9b5f4c and fixed in 5.15.33 with commit 51b82141fffa454abf937a8ff0b8af89e4fd0c8f
Issue introduced in 5.12 with commit 541c3bad8dc51b253ba8686d0cd7628e6b9b5f4c and fixed in 5.16.19 with commit d7fccf264b1a785525b366a5b7f8113c756187ad
Issue introduced in 5.12 with commit 541c3bad8dc51b253ba8686d0cd7628e6b9b5f4c and fixed in 5.17.2 with commit 0481baa2318cb1ab13277715da6cdbb657807b3f
Issue introduced in 5.12 with commit 541c3bad8dc51b253ba8686d0cd7628e6b9b5f4c and fixed in 5.18 with commit 18688de203b47e5d8d9d0953385bf30b5949324f
Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
kernel versions by the kernel community.
Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
older supported kernel versions. The official CVE entry at
https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2022-49236
will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
up to date information about this issue.
Affected files
==============
The file(s) affected by this issue are:
kernel/bpf/btf.c
Mitigation
==========
The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes. Individual
changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
release. Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
supported by the Linux kernel community at all. If however, updating to
the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
issue can be found at these commits:
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51b82141fffa454abf937a8ff0b8af89e4fd0c8f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7fccf264b1a785525b366a5b7f8113c756187ad
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0481baa2318cb1ab13277715da6cdbb657807b3f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18688de203b47e5d8d9d0953385bf30b5949324f
Powered by blists - more mailing lists