lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060905214703.GA16449@ele.uri.edu>
Date:	Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:47:04 -0400
From:	Will Simoneau <simoneau@....uri.edu>
To:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: warning at fs/ext3/inode.c:1016/ext3_getblk()

On 14:06 Tue 05 Sep     , Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Will Simoneau wrote:
> >Has anyone seen this before? These three traces occured at different times
> >today when three new user accounts (and associated quotas) were created. 
> >This
> >machine is an NFS server which uses quotas on an ext3 fs (dir_index is on).
> >Kernel is 2.6.17.11 on an x86 smp w/64G highmem; 4G ram is installed. The
> >affected filesystem is on a software raid1 of two hardware raid0 volumes 
> >from a
> >megaraid card.
> >
> >BUG: warning at fs/ext3/inode.c:1016/ext3_getblk()
> > <c01c5140> ext3_getblk+0x98/0x2a6  <c03b2806> md_wakeup_thread+0x26/0x2a
> > <c01c536d> ext3_bread+0x1f/0x88  <c01cedf9> ext3_quota_read+0x136/0x1ae
> > <c018b683> v1_read_dqblk+0x61/0xac  <c0188f32> dquot_acquire+0xf6/0x107
> > <c01ceaba> ext3_acquire_dquot+0x46/0x68  <c01897d4> dqget+0x155/0x1e7
> > <c018a97b> dquot_transfer+0x3e0/0x3e9  <c016fe52> dput+0x23/0x13e
> > 
> Made me curious and looking around on what the warning is coming ? Few 
> basic questions ..
> Do you have CONFIG_LBD ?
> 
> I see the ext3_getblk() used "long" for "block" & 
> ext3_get_blocks_handle() expects "sector_t"
> for "block". Wondering if you are running into 64-bit -to- 32-bit 
> conversion issues .. ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Badari
> 

CONFIG_LBD is on. GCC is 'Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1', if it matters.
FWIW, the machine is running 32-bit, although the cpus appear to support
EM64T. The filesystem's size is 138410144 1k-blocks; ext3 is using 4k
blocks/inodes.

This was not a problem on the previous kernel which was 2.6.13-rc3 with
the assert on net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918 disabled (from memory, even the
line number ;-) ).

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ