[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1157641877.7725.13.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:11:17 -0700
From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>, sct@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
> Ugh! Are you sure? For this path the buffer must be attached (only) to
> the running transaction. But then how the commit code comes to it?
> Somebody would have to even manage to refile the buffer from the
> committing transaction to the running one while the buffer is in wbuf[].
> Could you check whether someone does __journal_refile_buffer() on your
> marked buffers, please? Or whether we move buffer to BJ_Locked list in
> the write_out_data: loop? Thanks.
>
>
I added more debug in __journal_refile_buffer() to see if the marked
buffers are getting refiled. I am able to reproduce the problem,
but I don't see any debug including my original prints. (It looks as
if none of my debug code exists) - its really confusing.
I will keep looking and get back to you.
I may try Andrew's buffer debug patch - if I get desperate.
Thanks,
Badari
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists