linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC:PATCH 002/002] EXT3: Fix sparse warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060908221756.GB5192@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date:	Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:17:56 +0400
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC:PATCH 002/002] EXT3: Fix sparse warnings

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:39:30PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> EXT3: Fix sparse warnings

> --- linux001/fs/ext3/resize.c
> +++ linux002/fs/ext3/resize.c

> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int add_new_gdb(handle_t *handle,
>  	struct buffer_head *dind;
>  	int gdbackups;
>  	struct ext3_iloc iloc;
> -	__u32 *data;
> +	__le32 *data;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
> @@ -410,14 +410,14 @@ static int add_new_gdb(handle_t *handle,
>  		goto exit_bh;
>  	}
>  
> -	data = EXT3_I(inode)->i_data + EXT3_DIND_BLOCK;
> +	data = (__le32 *)(EXT3_I(inode)->i_data + EXT3_DIND_BLOCK);

Why cast is needed? i_data is __le32 * already.

> -	data = (__u32 *)dind->b_data;
> +	data = (__le32 *)dind->b_data;
>  	if (le32_to_cpu(data[gdb_num % EXT3_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(sb)]) != gdblock) {
>  		ext3_warning(sb, __FUNCTION__,
>  			     "new group %u GDT block "E3FSBLK" not reserved",
> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static int reserve_backup_gdb(handle_t *
>  	struct buffer_head *dind;
>  	struct ext3_iloc iloc;
>  	ext3_fsblk_t blk;
> -	__u32 *data, *end;
> +	__le32 *data, *end;
>  	int gdbackups = 0;
>  	int res, i;
>  	int err;
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int reserve_backup_gdb(handle_t *
>  	if (!primary)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> -	data = EXT3_I(inode)->i_data + EXT3_DIND_BLOCK;
> +	data = (__le32 *)(EXT3_I(inode)->i_data + EXT3_DIND_BLOCK);

Ditto.

> --- linux001/fs/ext3/super.c
> +++ linux002/fs/ext3/super.c
> @@ -2330,13 +2330,14 @@ static int ext3_remount (struct super_bl
>  
>  			ext3_mark_recovery_complete(sb, es);
>  		} else {
> -			__le32 ret;
> -			if ((ret = EXT3_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
> +			int ret;
> +			__le32 ret_le;
> +			if ((ret_le = EXT3_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
>  					~EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SUPP))) {
>  				printk(KERN_WARNING "EXT3-fs: %s: couldn't "
>  				       "remount RDWR because of unsupported "
>  				       "optional features (%x).\n",
> -				       sb->s_id, le32_to_cpu(ret));
> +				       sb->s_id, le32_to_cpu(ret_le));
>  				err = -EROFS;
>  				goto restore_opts;
>  			}

Get rid of "err = ret;" assignment below. It would be cleaner than
introducing new var.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html