linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060913203817.b6711381.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:38:17 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>, sct@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:25:19 -0500
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com> wrote:

> > +void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs)
> 
> Is there any reason this couldn't be static?

Nope.

> > +{
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
> > +               wbuf[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
> > +               /* We use-up our safety reference in submit_bh() */
> > +               submit_bh(WRITE, wbuf[i]);
> > +       }
> > +} 
> 
> I'm rebasing the ext4 work on the latest -mm tree and would like to
> avoid renaming this function in the jbd2 clone.

<edits the diff>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html