[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45117CA8.2010501@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:38:48 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 kernel patches against linux-2.6.18-rc7-mm1
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
>> # From Mingming Cao
>> sector_t-jbd2.patch
>
> I think this one needs to address the first, last variables in
> journal_fail_superblock():
>
> static int journal_reset(journal_t *journal)
> {
> journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock;
> - unsigned int first, last;
> + sector_t first, last;
>
> first = be32_to_cpu(sb->s_first);
> last = be32_to_cpu(sb->s_maxlen);
>
> (and then later change that back to unsigned long long, in the spirit of
> the patch series)
Hm, and looking further, I think this change:
journal_t * jbd2_journal_init_dev(struct block_device *bdev,
struct block_device *fs_dev,
- int start, int len, int blocksize)
+ sector_t start, int len, int blocksize)
is unnecessary; this is initializing the journal on an external device,
and start is in the first few blocks of the disk:
sb_block = EXT3_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE / blocksize;
start = sb_block + 1;
and len is also constrained by the maximum log size.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists