[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061011171638.GP22010@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:16:38 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Get rid of extents mount option - try 2
On Oct 06, 2006 16:21 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> EXT4: Get rid of extents mount option
>
> Enabling an ext4 file system to use extents should be done with
> 'tune2fs -O extents' or 'mke2fs -O extents', not with a mount option
I would agree that the presence of INCOMPAT_EXTENTS should imply the
EXTENTS mount option, but it is also desirable to be able to turn this
off for testing. In our internal patches we also have a "noextents"
mount option to disable extents at runtime even if "extents" was given
as a default mount option.
So, I would leave most of the code as-is (with "test_opt(sb, EXTENTS)"),
and just have ext3_fill_super() enable EXT4_MOUNT_EXTENTS if
INCOMPAT_EXTENTS is set. This is a tiny bit tricky since parse_options()
is called before the superblock is read, so I suspect we'll need a
separate EXT4_MOUNT_NOEXTENTS to distinguish between no mount "extents"
option given and "noextents" disabling this.
The Opt_noextents handling would clear EXT4_MOUNT_EXTENTS, and vice versa.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists