| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20061017110637.187ae3c0.pegasus@nerv.eu.org> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:06:37 +0200 From: Jure Pečar <pegasus@...v.eu.org> To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: ixt3 On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:51:30 -0600 Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com> wrote: > None of the retry code has been looked at. This is what I'm mostly interested in ... predictable, well behaving and tested error handling & recovery. Is ext4 going to be any better here than ext3? -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists