linux-ext4 - Re: a question about ext4_fsblk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610220858.k9M8wWHv013173@nrchpc.ac.cn>
Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:50:04 +0800
From:	"guomingyang" <guomingyang@...hpc.ac.cn>
To:	"guomingyang@...hpc.ac.cn" <guomingyang@...hpc.ac.cn>,
	"linux-ext4" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	"linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: a question about ext4_fsblk_t



   I also find many places where the block number type is not changed in namei.c and dir.c. Why? 
   Thank you to anyone who offer help
>Hello everyone:
>
>		I am a student interesting in linux filesystem, I have a problem about the replace of block number type to ext4_fsblk_t. Is it complete? Or has it passed all the test? Because I have found a place like this in linux-2.6.19-rc2/fs/ext4/inode.c 
>
>
>
>+struct buffer_head *ext4_bread(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>+                               int block, int create, int *err)
>
>
>the block's type is not changed. Although I think it will bring no mistake, I doubt about why not change it. Thank you !
>
>
>guomingyang
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

guomingyang

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html