| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:31:08 -0500
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@...barn.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Ext3 online defrag
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:44 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:59:28PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > That's the wrong way to look at it. if you want the userspace
> > process to specify a location, then you should preallocate it first
> > before doing anything else. There is no need to clutter a simple
> > data mover interface with all sorts of unnecessary error handling.
>
> This is doable, but it adds a huge amount of complexity before we
> could implement on-line defragmentation.
>
> First of all, we would need a way of allowing userpsace to specify
> which blocks should be used in the preallocation.
>
> Secondly, we would need a way of marking blocks as "preallocated but
> not pre-zeroed"; otherwise we would have to zero out all of the blocks
> in order to assure security (don't want userspace programs seeing the
> previous contents of the data blocks), only to do the copy and the
> extents vector swap
Chris Mason page place holder work for DIRECT IO should be applicable to
any pre-allocations?
--
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@...barn.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists