[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061026160241.GB12843@skl-net.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:02:41 +0200
From: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: ext3: bogus i_mode errors with 2.6.18.1
On 03:36, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2006 11:44 +0200, Andre Noll wrote:
> > Are you saying that ext3_set_bit() should simply be called with
> > "ret_block" as its first argument? If yes, that is what the revised
> > patch below does.
>
> You might need to call ext3_set_bit_atomic() (as claim_block() does,
> not sure.
I _think_ it doesn't matter much which one is used as on most archs
ext3_set_bit_atomic() is only a wrapper for test_and_set_bit() just like
ext3_set_bit() is. The only exceptions seem to be those archs that use
the generic bitops and m68knommu.
> The other issue is that you need to potentially set "num" bits in the
> bitmap here, if those all overlap metadata. In fact, it might just
> make more sense at this stage to walk all of the bits in the bitmaps,
> the inode table and the backup superblock and group descriptor to see
> if they need fixing also.
I tried to implement this, but I could not find out how to check at this
point whether a given bit (in the block bitmap, say) needs fixing.
Thanks
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists