[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <016301c7089b$fe322240$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:54:03 +0900
From: "Takashi Sato" <sho@...s.nec.co.jp>
To: "Alex Tomas" <alex@...sterfs.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Ext3 online defrag
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your information.
I have sent the patches of the defragmentation for a extent-based
file on ext3 using your patches of the multi-block allocation.
I'm happy if you have a time to review my patches.
"[RFC][PATCH 0/3] Extent base online defrag"
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ext4&m=116307062907075&w=2
And I'd like to start considering the defragmentation for ext4.
Do you have a plan to update your patches for ext4?
> I've been reworking mballoc with few new features:
>
> 1) in-core preallocation
> like existing reservation, but can preallocate few pieces for a file
>
> 2) locality groups
> to maintain groups of related files and flush them together.
> say, two users are unpacking kernel. with delayed allocation
> we've got bunch of files from the both in cache. then we flush
> first set (few MBs) of files from one user, then from another.
> this way write I/Os will be large enough to achieve good
> throughput and files are still quite localized to be used later
> at good read rate.
>
> 3) scalable reservation
> required for delayed allocation to avoid -ENOSPC at flush time.
> current version uses per-sb spinlock.
>
> probably we could add something for defragmentation?
Cheers, Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists