[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061206214934.GA4551@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:49:34 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: Jean-Noel Cordenner <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 2/3] change attribute for ext4: ext4 specific code
On Nov 29, 2006 19:54 +0100, Jean-Noel Cordenner wrote:
> This part of the patch concerns the ext4 code.
I was looking more closely at this code, and wondering two things:
- why not just use the existing inode->i_version field instead of
adding a new i_change_attribute? The i_version is not used by
the VFS at all, and only for detecting directory modifications in
ext3 (where it has the same semantic as the new i_change_attribute
anyways). This avoids bloating the VFS inode more than it already is.
- why not just do an increment of i_version in ext3_do_update_inode()?
That is ext3_dirty_inode->ext3_mark_inode_dirty->ext3_mark_iloc_dirty()
and also handles all of the VFS locations that call notify_change().
This MUST be called anywhere that we make a persistent change to the
inode in order to flush it to disk. That would reduce the patch to
a few lines at most. I don't think there are any places we need to
supplement this (even mmap IO or writes to a hole will update mtime).
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists