[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165443391.1281.135.camel@edge>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:16:31 +1100
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@...nex.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc: Nikolai Joukov <kolya@...sunysb.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Secure Deletion and Trash-Bin Support for Ext4
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 20:11 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> ...
> If all we need to add to XFS is support for those flags, then XFS
> support would be trivial to add.
>
> Oh, damn. I take that back. We're almost out of flag space in the on
> disk inode - these two flags would use the last 2 flag bits so this
> may require an on disk inode format change in XFS. This will be
> a little more complex than I first thought, ...
It should be OK - you can do it without an inode version revision
if you take a second 16 bits for "di_flags2" from here...
xfs_dinode_core {
...
__uint8_t di_pad[8]; /* unused, zeroed space */
Its guaranteed zeroed initially (i.e. all flags unset) and the XFS
get/set flags APIs are 32 bits, so you should be OK there.
Also, it may also be possible to reclaim di_onlink at some point (maybe
now, since 16 bits would be good here) if mkfs.xfs is changed to always
create v2 inodes (dynamic conversion ATM IIRC)... not 100% sure though,
needs more code analysis.
cheers.
--
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists