[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070106211510.GA4997@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:15:10 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: conditional removal of NFSD code
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 12:16:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:58:31 +0300
> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> > --- a/fs/ext2/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext2/namei.c
> > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static struct dentry *ext2_lookup(struct
> > return d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_EXPORTFS) || defined(CONFIG_EXPORTFS_MODULE)
> > struct dentry *ext2_get_parent(struct dentry *child)
>
> hm. Officially, one module isn't supposed to know about the presence of
> another one at compile-time.
Whole new requirement.
> Someone might want to come along and later
> configure and compile the nfsd module and then try to load it into a kernel
> which wasn't compiled with nfsd enabled.
methinks, this is not a case.
agrep _MODULE -n | grep defined -w
shows plenty of cases, where code is conditionally compiled out with
CONFIG_IPV6 being the major "offender".
> But given that both modules are in mainline I suspect that nobody would
> really be doing that in practice, and in the case of nfsd it might not even
> work.
Yes, compat_sys_nfsservctl() is conditionally compiled in.
I interpret CONFIG_FOO=n as
"I am not going to use FOO, not now, not in future".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists