[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3odnv4iwu.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:03:45 +0300
From: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: booked-page-flag.patch
>>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> Sorry, we're seriously, seriously, seriously short on flags in the page
AM> struct and this patch is going to need one heck of a good case for it to be
AM> acceptable.
AM> Even then, we should put a lot of effort into finding some way of avoiding
AM> adding that page flag. One option might be to add a new radix-tree tag,
AM> and defining it as "for filesytem usage". Or use PG_checked (which should
AM> be renamed to to PG_fs_misc) (if that doesn't conflict with ext4's existing
AM> use of PG_checked). Or use !PageMappedToDisk()?
there is a difference between being mapped and "booked".
the latter means that page isn't allocated yet, but
space is reserved (including metadata) and we're sure
we'll be able to allocate space when the page is being
flushed.
AM> These patches seem to have a number of issues - we should get them properly
AM> commented and properly changelogged then get them on the wire for decent
AM> review before investing too much in them, please.
I've been reworking the delayed allocation patch to move
part of it into VFS. I'll try to comment things better
this time.
thanks, Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists