[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070301231118.427544a4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:11:18 +0000
From: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, suparna@...ibm.com,
cmm@...ibm.com, alex@...sterfs.com, suzuki@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:05:36 -0800
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> > A lot of people get confused about -ENOTTY, but it is the return for
> > attempting to use an ioctl on the wrong type of object, so this appears
> > to be quite correct.
>
> This is a syscall though; ENOSYS is probably a better match.
ENOSYS indicates quite different things and ENOTTY is also used for
syscalls. I still think ENOTTY is correct.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists