linux-ext4 - Re: cleaned up ext4 patch series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070319173122.GC5967@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:31:22 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cleaned up ext4 patch series

On Mar 19, 2007  09:15 -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> I wonder if we should create two branches: one branch for patches that
> are well discussed and tested, which Andrew could trust and pull to mm
> tree; and create another branch to store patches that are still under
> discussion and likely to be rewriten based on the review feedback.

Yes, that makes a lot of sense.  It would avoid issues like Andrew finding
problems with the nanosecond patches because they hadn't been widely tested
yet.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html