[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319093006.GB12092@amitarora.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:00:06 +0530
From: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, suparna@...ibm.com,
cmm@...ibm.com, alex@...sterfs.com, suzuki@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 04:33:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:01:01 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > +asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len);
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.20.1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.20.1/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h
> > @@ -305,3 +305,4 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(faccessat)
> > COMPAT_SYS_SPU(get_robust_list)
> > COMPAT_SYS_SPU(set_robust_list)
> > COMPAT_SYS(move_pages)
> > +SYSCALL(fallocate)
>
> It is going to need to be a COMPAT_SYS call in powerpc because 32 bit
> powerpc will pass the two loff_t's in pairs of registers while
> 64bit passes them in one register each.
Ok. Will make that change, unless it is decided to pass each loff_t
argument as two "u32"s. Thanks!
--
Regards,
Amit Arora
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists