linux-ext4 - Ext4 benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45FFFBAA.6080404@bull.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:20:10 +0100
From:	Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Ext4 benchmarks

Hi all,

we already discussed during the conf calls what
benchmarks should be ran on ext4.

As we have OLS paper on the table we were thinking
here at Bull what bench t run and on which kernel.

If we want trying to compare ext3 and ext4, I guess we
should at least show that :
- ext4 has equivalent perfs than ext3,
- improvements done for ext3 are still in ext4 (mb alloc, del alloc...).

So  we were wondering what's best to do :
- run on 2.6.19 (includes del alloc and mb alloc if I am not wrong),
- run on 2.6.20 (lacks mb alloc),

- select relevant benchs (iozone...).

What do you think ?

Thanks.


jean-pierre

 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html