lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:20:10 +0100 From: Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Ext4 benchmarks Hi all, we already discussed during the conf calls what benchmarks should be ran on ext4. As we have OLS paper on the table we were thinking here at Bull what bench t run and on which kernel. If we want trying to compare ext3 and ext4, I guess we should at least show that : - ext4 has equivalent perfs than ext3, - improvements done for ext3 are still in ext4 (mb alloc, del alloc...). So we were wondering what's best to do : - run on 2.6.19 (includes del alloc and mb alloc if I am not wrong), - run on 2.6.20 (lacks mb alloc), - select relevant benchs (iozone...). What do you think ? Thanks. jean-pierre - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists