linux-ext4 - Re: Ext4 benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070330084309.GA9249@lombardij>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:43:09 +0200
From:	Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@...l.net>
To:	"Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 benchmarks

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:20:50AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> While it may be to late for the purposes of your OLS paper, one thing 
> that doesn't seem to be getting much attention is the performance of a 
> file system while doing many meta-data operations or throughput testing 
> during heavy journal log activity.

Back in 2005, Alex sent a patch to monitor journal activity through procfs:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=113538565128617&w=2

We have been using this patch for more than 1 year and it is very useful
for investigating performance issues.
Does anybody know why this patch hasn't found its way into the mainline?
Maybe it could be merged in jbd2?

Johann
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html