[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070408175218.GB29180@thunk.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:52:18 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: coly <colyli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: confused on different inode size
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:39:03PM +0800, coly wrote:
> Hi, list:
>
> I find size of struct ext4_inode is 152 bytes, but from the dumpe2fs, it
> tells me the inode size is 128 bytes.
>
> I am confused that, the ext4_inode is the on-disk inode format, so how
> can dumpe2fs tells the inode size is 128 bytes.
>
> Further more, when I use sb_bread() to read inode from inode table (with
> 152 bytes inode size), I can not read proper data from the bh->b_data.
> Once I use 128 bytes inode size, I can read what I want from the
> bh->b_data.
The inode size for ext4 filesystems can be multiple sizes; the
traditional ext2/ext3 inode size is 128 bytes. If so, then you won't
have any of the features that require inode fields starting at
i_extra_isize. If you use an inode size of 256 bytes, then you will
be able to use nanosecond granularity timestamps, and the extra space
(256-152 bytes) can be used for fast access to extended attributes.
If there is an expectation that the filesystem will need a larger
amount of space for extended attributes, the filesystem can be
formatted with 512, 1024, or even larger sizes (so long as it is a
power of two >= 128 bytes).
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists